ERC 20 on Ethereum: Growth Risks and Hidden Traps in 2025

New ERC-20 token creation on Ethereum YTD has increased by ~15% vs. 2024 (same period). At the same time, ERC-20 transfers on Ethereum YTD are up ~36% vs. 2024 (same period), with over 660M transfers expected by end-2025.

Bar chart ERC-20 tokens created on Ethereum YTD.
Bar chart comparing the number of ERC-20 tokens created on Ethereum between January 1 and September 3 over two years. In 2024, 160,807 tokens were created, shown as a purple bar. In 2025, 185,745 tokens were created, shown as a cyan bar.

The data shows token creation is rising and trading is more aggressive. The full 2025 dataset isn’t available yet. Still, a 2024 research already showed the pattern clearly: “monthly counts of vanished crypto-tokens (no longer traded …) indicate the high crypto-tokens turnover level”. In other words, most tokens are short-lived—launched quickly, hyped briefly, then abandoned. New deployments come in waves, but many go inactive within months.

In 2025, rug pulls occur less often than before, but they’ve grown far more advanced. Fraudsters now blend aggressive AI-driven marketing with wash trading to manufacture trust before draining liquidity.

AI and Token Generators

AI tools for Solidity and token-generator web apps are likely behind the spike in ERC-20 creation. Launching a token is now trivial, lowering barriers and fueling growth, but also creating systemic risks.

This incentive misalignment allows scammers to mass-produce tokens with minor adjustments, testing until one bypasses automated scanners. Dormant functions let creators flip the switch—flooding supply, draining transfers with 100% taxes, or freezing liquidity to trap sellers.

Common Risks in New ERC-20 Tokens

My team is building Dedaub tok{In}, a token intelligence tool, and I scan via its API 100 ERC-20 tokens deployed on Ethereum over the past 24 hours, identifying common risks and highlighting areas where traders should focus. Among 100 new ERC-20 tokens, nearly 16% included tax functionality. While some projects use small fixed taxes legitimately, scammers exploit this by coding hidden or extreme fees. Supply manipulation risk is relatively high, with over 60% of tokens presenting functionalities that can inflate or erase supply at will. Honeypot mechanics seem less popular with trading caps appearing in just 3% of tokens. You can access the full report here.

Transfer Restrictions

Around 8% of tokens used blacklist/whitelist functions, blocking trading for most users and letting only insiders move funds. Another 3% imposed trading caps, with a fraction (20%) even able to modify those caps after launch. These mechanics create conditions where outsiders buy in but cannot exit, often disguised as anti-bot or anti-whale protection.

Transfer Restrictions Mechanism on 100 ERC20 Tokens.
Blocks users from selling or moving tokens. Creates honeypots where only insiders can exit, trapping victims under the guise of anti-whale or anti-bot protection.

Hidden Taxes and Fee Drains

26% of the tokens carried built-in tax functions, with 2% leaving those taxes modifiable after launch. Hidden fees often surface later, working against traders.

Hidden Takes Mechanism on 100 ERC20 Tokens.
Allows developers to impose or adjust transaction fees silently. In extreme cases, it can raise sales taxes to 100%, effectively draining the full value of tokens from sellers.

Supply Manipulation Risks

30% of contracts retained mint/burn functions, and 60% gave the owner broad control. A quarter still exposed the owner’s address, meaning creators could dilute supply or lock users out at will.

Supply Manipulation Mechanism on 100 ERC20 Tokens.
Allows developers to arbitrarily inflate or burn the token supply, leading to sudden holder dilution, artificial price pumps, or mass dumping of newly minted tokens into liquidity pools.

Conclusion

ERC-20 creation is still climbing, but most new launches remain fragile and risky. Automated generators and AI tools fuel growth while embedding hidden backdoors. Scams are less frequent but more severe. Pre-trade checks are essential in a market where many tokens carry hidden risks that can turn them into traps rather than tradeable assets.

Resources

Related Posts

VIEW ALL
Transient Storage in the wild: An impact study on EIP-1153
Research

Transient Storage in the wild: An impact study on EIP-1153

With the recent introduction of transient storage in Ethereum, the landscape of state management …

22 October 2024
EIP-3074 Impact Study
Research

EIP-3074 Impact Study

Pectra’s EIP-3074, and its Impact on Deployed Smart Contracts Introduction Ethereum’s end-user …

3 May 2024
Ethereum improvement proposal 4788 | EIP-4877 Summary
Research

Ethereum improvement proposal 4788 | EIP-4877 Summary

Dedaub was commissioned by the Ethereum Foundation to perform a security audit of the bytecode of a …

7 October 2023